|
Opinion
|
| Can we say that politicians are voluntarily politically mature? | | | | Article 1 describes federalism in India as a unique system within the state and central government in many listed matters including the state list and current list but can we often stress our minds to how the chapters of our constitution are being discussed under the very significant listed matters in the federal unique state. I and you feel wonder and perhaps almost all of us have a lot of experience that is not needed to share here but horse trading, pandemonium in parliament and state assemblies is always broadcasting and every one from child to adolescents realize that politicians are non-mature politically.
No doubt the law makers are framing the laws in favor of the people of state but whether the executive power of authority is showing their interest to bind upon all those laws. Bartend Russel has said ‘that every man is born free but everywhere he is in chains” is really true there is everywhere chaining system in the all lists under the state list and current list the enforcement agencies also and often being found to failure to implement the all those laws constitutionally meant for the all citizens. It is wonder you know that the definition of Bartend Russel the chain system got other sense in the present era, the chain of corruption, and most significant thing is that within the premises of parliament or state assemblies the law makers even has to face the challenges to make the amendment in certain laws and surely to make the same consensus or consent on the bill is always being found hard nut to crack .
The law makers are often penetrating and outlining the sketch to get the absolute majority to pass any bill or amendments in any bill. The noisy parliament is the evidence of all the happenings and presentation of day in and day out parade in parliament or in state assemblies.
"federation" is not explicitly mentioned in the Indian Constitution, elements of federalism were introduced by the Government of India Act of 1919. India's federal system is considered sui generis, balancing state autonomy with the need for strong central governance.
The topic of federalism is an important one concerning Indian polity. It is also in the news nowadays, especially with respect to the spats between the central and the state governments.
From the sideline of parliament, the statement of any politician is not being matched with the statement of the becoming the sources of any media communication agency. That during the discussions on news webs or channels the politician viewing and screening their presentation before the public at large.
On the first day of their entrance in democratic temples the politicians by virtue and quality of oath the expectations of the people are very often high but the noisy politics in all such democratic temples finally make much more disturbances among the voters.
It is an institutional mechanism to accommodate two sets of politics, one at the central or national level and the second at the regional or provincial level. It is a stage that recognizes all politicians to make their performance for the welfare of the people of the state. But alas to say here that the gaps of seat arrangements within the instructional mechanisms is being widening for unknown reasons best known by themselves.
That for the vested interest politics and vote ballot often the statement of politicians is never being matching and often the statement of yesterday naturally not matching with the statement of today or of another day. what one politician is saying in central Delhi capital and what he is saying in the crown head state is often viewing dissimilar facts and diverting the attention of the people of the country and misleading the public by way of their non-maturity is not a good thing for all round development of the state and good governances at all. Under these circumstances can we say that the politicians are voluntarily, politically mature.
| | | | |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|